newsletter box

help bitmap

Our Campaigns

Share

A workhouse museum on the Selly Oak Hospital site

kingsnortonworkhouse 2signourpetition box

This year the new Queen Elizabeth Hospital becomes fully operational. The old Selly Oak Hosiptal site will then become fully mothballed. On the site are the buildings that made up the old Kings Norton Union Workhouse. Until recently they were used by the military as part of their military wing treating wounded soldiers from Iraq and from Afghanistan.
We believe that these important buildings should not be demolished to make way for housing but should be preserved and restored as a workhouse museum. There are very few such museums in Britain.

A brief history
The first buildings on the site of Selly Oak Hospital were those of the King’s Norton Union Workhouse. It was a place for the care of the poor and was one of many workhouses constructed throughout the country following the introduction of the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834. This act replaced the earlier system of poor relief, dating from 1601.
The rising costs of poor relief had become a national problem and the new act sought to address this. Throughout the country, parishes were formed into larger unions with the power to raise money from rates on property to pay for the poor. King’s Norton Poor Law Union was formed from the parishes of Harborne, Edgbaston, King’s Norton, Northfield and Beoley. Each of these five parishes had individual workhouses.

These were replaced in 1872 by the new, much larger one at Selly Oak. It was built to accommodate 200 pauper inmates. Central supervision by the Poor Law Commissioners in London ensured that all workhouses were administered similarly by a set of rules and regulations.
The aim of the Poor Law Amendment Act was to deny any form of relief except through admission to the workhouse. Generally it was assumed that the able-bodied poor could find work and if they didn’t then they should be forced to work within the confines of the workhouse. It was thought that if conditions in the workhouse were really bad then the poor would be deterred from seeking relief. However, by the late 18th century it became apparent that the majority of workhouse inmates were the most vulnerable people in society; the young, the old, the chronic sick and the mentally ill. Various Acts of Parliament ruled that separate provision should be made for children and the mentally ill. The sick poor were to be accommodated in separate infirmary blocks. These were often built adjacent to the workhouses and were the forerunners of many great hospitals of today.
Commemorative plaque recording the opening of the King's Norton Union's Infirmary at Selly Oak, on the "3rd Day of September 1897"
At Selly Oak, a separate infirmary was built in 1897 at a cost of £52,000. It was the subject of much heated debate as the original estimate had been £18,000. It was a light, clean and practical building, and generally a source of much pride.
The Infirmary accommodated about 250 patients in eight Nightingale wards and smaller side wards and rooms. There was also provision for maternity cases. Between the two main pavilions were a central administration block, kitchens, a laundry, a water tower, doctors’ rooms and a telephone exchange. There was no operating theatre or mortuary and, in the workhouse tradition, the internal walls were not plastered, painted brick being considered good enough for the sick paupers. The workhouse and infirmary were separated by a high dividing wall and were run as separate establishments.
The population of the King’s Norton Union increased dramatically, and in 1907 extensions to the infirmary and the workhouse made provision for the growing numbers of poor people. This doubled the size of the main hospital building. The Woodlands Nurses’ Home was built at the same time to accommodate forty nurses. A small operating room was added to the infirmary.
In 1911, King’s Norton – no longer a rural area – left Worcestershire and became part of the City of Birmingham. The Birmingham Union was formed from the unions of King’s Norton, Aston and Birmingham. The King’s Norton Workhouse Infirmary was renamed Selly Oak Hospital.



Share

The Restoration of the Girls' Recreation Ground

cadbury girls recreation ground ornamental pond

signourpetition box

ornimental pond

Councillor Nigel Dawkins and his fellow Bournville Councillors are vigorously apposing any plans by Cadbury to 'fill in' the Ornamental Pond located at the centre of the Girls’ Recreation Ground on Bournville Lane opposite the factory.

The Girls' Recreation Ground is in the Bournville Green Conservation  area. It is on Cadbury private ground but the public are allowed to access it.

It is a very important part of the history of Bournville. George Cadbury built two recreations grounds at the beginning of the 20th Century for his employees; one for men and the other for women.

The Girls' Recreation Ground was almost a secret garden for his female employees. The ornamental pond is at the centre of those gardens along with several grade II listed buildings also built by George Cadbury. It would be an act of historical vandalism to fill in this pond and is totally unnecessary.

The pond does not need destroying it needs a proper maintenance program so that this secret garden can be enjoyed by everyone for another 100 years’.

Read More

Why not visit, it is a lovely walk around the Girls' Recreation Ground; many of you will see something you have not seen before and you will be helping to preserve a wonderful part of Bournville’s unique history for our children.

 

Share

Should Bournville be a World Heritage Site?

bournville%20green%20misty.jpg
bournville%20factory.jpgsignourpetition box

Like so many residents we believe that Bournville is one of the most unique places in the world.

I believe this uniqueness should be recognised by attempting to have Bournville nominated as a World Heritage Site.

World Heritage Sites are those sites felt by the United Nations UNESCO organisation to be sites in the world of outstanding cultural value.

The Pyramids in Egypt and the Taj Mahal in India are known to us all. However, what is less well known is that in the UK we already have 27 World Heritage sites such as the Derwent Valley Mills, Iron Bridge, Saltaire and of course Stonehenge.

We are convinced that Bournville's unique cultural and industrial history and outstanding architecture makes it an ideal candidate to become another UK based World Heritage Site.

It will not be easy and it will not be quick. It could take many years trying to overcome the various hurdles and even then we could fail. However, the prize would allow Bournville to join a unique world club of heritage sites. The enhanced status would also give greater protection to Bournville, dramatically enhance its reputation and lead to greater investment.

What do you think? The details have yet to be worked out but we are very interested to know at this stage what residents feel about this proposal.

 

 

 

Share